ANTIGONE'S ANIKE: THE UNLIKELY TWINS
ANTIGONE’S ANIKE: THE UNLIKELY TWINS
Anike is a play which resembles Antigone and I found it exactly the same, well of course the setting and culture is different but the plot and characters and characterizations are the same. Frankly speaking, I was bored with the play as it talks about the same thing and I felt that it was no thrill reading Anike, as I could guess what would happen next, and what the characters are going to say. But I do like Wong Phui Nam’s descriptions of certain settings and situations, for example the decaying body of Sirat. I could visualise and imagine it so vividly, though I have never seen a dead body, better off a decaying one, I felt that Phui Nam’s description made me see a decaying body. What would the decaying skin look like when it’s oxidised and I never knew there’d be fermentation, like beer or even bread, when added yeast. When I read a good material, I prefer it to be unpredictable or at least you can’t wait to know the ending, Anike is a good reading, but I suppose it would be better if one read the play, Anike first before Antigone. Basically because Anike is a local play, and the culture and elements in the play is somewhat common to us, and I felt that it follows exactly the plot of Antigone and it’s just that you reading the same old thing again. The reason I felt this because I guess too much of Antigone was fed into me, and me indulging into the play too much, that at one point I felt like throwing up. But there are some elements that still held my attention in Anike, for instance, the Malaysian culture nicely blended, but it still made me wonder few things. Firstly, the usage of “Daulat Tuanku”, I always thought the phrase was came to use when Islam arrived in Malacca, but the play was set before the arrival of Islam. Then there was ‘tosai’ as the food in one part of the play, I’m not sure all these was in Temasek (now known as Singapore) at that time. When I learnt Malay History (Sejarah Melayu) in Form 6, I got to know that the Siamese was in Temasek before the Majapahits, who fled to Malacca later on. I’m still trying to figure out the link or it was all just imagination, then of course I would never see even the glimpse of the link.
Anike is a play which resembles Antigone and I found it exactly the same, well of course the setting and culture is different but the plot and characters and characterizations are the same. Frankly speaking, I was bored with the play as it talks about the same thing and I felt that it was no thrill reading Anike, as I could guess what would happen next, and what the characters are going to say. But I do like Wong Phui Nam’s descriptions of certain settings and situations, for example the decaying body of Sirat. I could visualise and imagine it so vividly, though I have never seen a dead body, better off a decaying one, I felt that Phui Nam’s description made me see a decaying body. What would the decaying skin look like when it’s oxidised and I never knew there’d be fermentation, like beer or even bread, when added yeast. When I read a good material, I prefer it to be unpredictable or at least you can’t wait to know the ending, Anike is a good reading, but I suppose it would be better if one read the play, Anike first before Antigone. Basically because Anike is a local play, and the culture and elements in the play is somewhat common to us, and I felt that it follows exactly the plot of Antigone and it’s just that you reading the same old thing again. The reason I felt this because I guess too much of Antigone was fed into me, and me indulging into the play too much, that at one point I felt like throwing up. But there are some elements that still held my attention in Anike, for instance, the Malaysian culture nicely blended, but it still made me wonder few things. Firstly, the usage of “Daulat Tuanku”, I always thought the phrase was came to use when Islam arrived in Malacca, but the play was set before the arrival of Islam. Then there was ‘tosai’ as the food in one part of the play, I’m not sure all these was in Temasek (now known as Singapore) at that time. When I learnt Malay History (Sejarah Melayu) in Form 6, I got to know that the Siamese was in Temasek before the Majapahits, who fled to Malacca later on. I’m still trying to figure out the link or it was all just imagination, then of course I would never see even the glimpse of the link.
